And those who can't, teach. The playwright George Bernard Shaw is said to have once said that.
Woody Allen is even more disparaging of teachers: Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach, teach gym.
This afternoon I had a most interesting and enlightening conversation with a former student in VC 137. He's majoring in Film, in Mass Com. He had texted me last week if he could consult me about his plans to get into advertising. He was hoping, as his text went, to get "some tips on becoming successful in advertising." And I replied with something like, "Why me, of all people? Hahaha. If I wer any mor succssful in advrtsng, I probly wouldn't be teaching now." Just before we parted ways, he brought it up and he asked me why I said that.
But I am getting ahead of my story.
Rewind to the first part. We had agreed to meet in FA at 1:30 PM, but he was already there when I arrived at 1:10 PM. We talked in the faculty room, and he seemed almost embarassed to talk to me because there were other profs in the room (in FA profs share a common room--we only have cubicles). So I told him we can talk in the FA lib. And as we walked, he told me that he was worried because of his academic background.
Turns out, that he had already spent five years already as a Statistics major and he shifted to Film just as he was about to finish. He says he was torn between Vis Com and Film, that time he left Statistics. After a talk with Ma'am Mitzi, he finally decided to enroll at CMC. (I wonder what Ma'am Mitzi told him.) I reassured him that he needn't worry, because I have a friend who has an Econ degree from the Ateneo, who worked as a pre-school teacher, then a reporter for BusinessWorld before she got into advertising and worked her way up. I said that the advertising industry was a merry stew of people from different backgrounds. And that stranger backgrounds actually made more interesting creatives.
But, he said that he finally realized what he wanted to do after taking my VC 137 class. (I blushed, not because I found what he said very flattering but because he is such a cutie. Ask Ma'am Mitzi. A very nice articulate and polite one, at that. If I had a younger sister his age, I wouldn't mind him dating my sister, or kung mas maaga ako lumandi, my daughter. Yikes--yes, he's on Friendster, too.) Of course, I did not readily believe him, because, after all, this was a guy who was asking for tips to get into advertising and he must have naively (or shrewdly) thought I can use my connections to get him into advertising. Or then again, he might've picked me because I was, so far, his only link to advertising as yet.
But in the course of our conversation, as he vividly recalled the things he liked about our class--the writing and layout exercises, the strategy writing, the campaign planning, the group work, the pitch--i got convinced that the guy was sincere. He even remembered the name of one of our panelists, when I mentioned that he can try to apply at the agency where this panelist worked as VP, once he graduates.
He said he especially liked the radio exercises. (There were two. In the first one I made the students write a monologue for a character without revealing what the character was supposed to be--it was a preparatory exercise in characterization and diction. The second was an exercise in writing a radio commercial using a vivid demonstration or a vivid metaphor.) He said that he can see himself doing that.
I suggested that he get himself an internship with an ad agency for his practicum. He was worried that Vis Com majors got an edge, because of their art directorial skills on top of their writing skills (his fear is actually justified--teaching VC 137 made me realize that there are a lot of really good writers--future creative director materials--in FA); he asked if it would help if he learned Photoshop. (He really did seem so passionate about getting into the advertising business.) I admitted to him that Vis Com majors did have a bit of an edge because they have profs who are practitioners, but that he needn't really worry because he was interested in writing copy, after all, and not in becoming an art director. Besides, he really could write (i remember he wrote a really clever ad for C2) and, as a Film major, for sure, he was a visual thinker as well.
He was so concerned in making his resume so ready for that time he will apply to ad agencies, so he asked if it would help if he took psych subjects as electives. I told him it wasn't necessary at all. I found it so funny and touching--his intensity and naivete. (Oh, if he only knew about the disappointments and heartaches, too. Uh oh. Did I paint such a rosy, dreamy and unrealistic picture of advertising?) All he needed to have, I said, was to have a keen understanding of consumer insights, and the consumer buying system. And that comes, no more from intellectualizing than from gut feel. Which he can also use in coming up with the Big Idea. The other things, I said, he can already learn on the job. And besides, I told him that his main concern, for now, should really just be on how to get a foot in the door of advertising.
There were other things he recalled from our class. (Incredible, because it was already a year ago.) He also said he learned how to look at ads and how to critique them, and that he's done it ever since. (This was our very first exercise. To bring print ads that sucked and tell the class why it sucked. I made them rewrite and relayout these ads in the second exercise.) He said he was grateful for all the things he learned in our (very) short semester. (As a substitute prof, I tried so hard to pack a sem's worth of work into 3 months because the students were understandably feeling shortchanged in the almost two months they didn't have a prof. Was so lucky my hastily put-together syllabus worked; we were able to cover a lot of ground and we had great pitches to present to a professional panel at the end of the sem.) And so, before we parted, he asked me about a reply I made in our text exchange.
"Because," he said, "I'd like to think that people who teach, choose to teach." He sounded disappointed, perhaps because he didn't want to think that a prof who's inspired him to find his purpose thought of herself as an advertising castoff.
And that's when I told him about the Woody Allen quote. I laughingly told him I was always self-deprecating.
(What I didn't tell him though, is what he helped me discover in myself--something I have not convinced myself till this afternoon--because of my numerous self-doubts. That, simply, I could teach! Because of him, I am now beginning to think I really could. I'd always thought I'd gotten into teaching by accident. And, most important of all, he also taught me that the students--at least most of them--are really listening. For all the indifference they sometimes show me, hahaha, this is so hard to believe. Thank you so much, C. And, good luck!)
Recent Comments